Policy 2019

January

Law Commission and Scottish Law Commission consultation on the Legal Regulation of Autonomous Vehicles
 
The TPS response highlighted that autonomous vehicles (AV) will be operated in a number of modes depending on the degree of supervision required, ranging from the vehicle being manually driven to a requirement for no supervision (or even a qualified driver on board) when a vehicle operates in its own self-contained and segregated environment. We identified the need for legislation to be tailored to these different operating circumstances. For example, a user-in-charge ready to take over control of a vehicle at any moment would be prohibited from undertaking secondary tasks while a user-in-charge of a vehicle operating in automatic mode over part of its journey on a highway or part of a highway dedicated to such usage would have much more flexibility.  TPS also counselled that the idea of a "driverless'" vehicle operating door-to-door on the public highway in mixed use circumstances is a long way off and that it is premature to legislate fo such use now.
 
Click here to read the TPS response on the Legal Regulation of Autonomous Vehicles
 

May 

DfT Consultation on LRT

The TPS response highlighted the fact that LRT has a key role to play in UK cities and that there is considerable “grassroots” support for new schemes. However, we pointed out that there are many obstacles to LRT implementation and that it is 15 years since any wholly new system opened in the UK (Nottingham in 2004). Our planning and legislative processes, coupled with a lack of funding, have made it difficult to successfully promote schemes and bring them to fruition within a sensible timescale. In contrast, continental cities appear to better streamline LRT implementation as a result of strong civic leadership, better integrated land-use and transport planning, and stronger regulation and control of public transport services at a city region level. TPS considered that a shift in favour towards reliable, rapid urban transit combined with a strengthening of the powers and resources of City Regions and Combined Authorities will be needed to reinvigorate LRT investment.

Click here to read the TPS response on LRT

Response to Williams Rail Review

The TPS response highlighted the need for the wider societal benefits of rail to be fully recognized and taken into account when assessing options emerging from the Review. TPS also highlighted the need not only to consider cost to the taxpayer but also value for money to the taxpayer from investment in rail, and the need to recognise the fiscal benefits accruing to other Government departments where rail supports other government policies. TPS urged greater resources and funds for regional and local bodies to invest in local rail development, as well as more proactive local authority involvement in station management. Finally, seamless travel in terms of physical interaction between modes, timetabling and ticketing is important, including the possibility of TOC’s being encouraged to effectively extend the rail network at low cost by operating quality bus services fully integrated with their rail services.

Click here to read the TPS response to the Williams Rail Review

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Web design by Tribal Systems